<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Declining Value of Human Life: Pets More Important Than Humans To Some</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cantholdmytongue.com/2007/11/15/151/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cantholdmytongue.com/2007/11/15/151/</link>
	<description>Another Wordpress black weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:52:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: marcg</title>
		<link>http://cantholdmytongue.com/2007/11/15/151/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>marcg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cantholdmytongue.com/2007/11/15/151/#comment-838</guid>
		<description>You make a good point, Janice but still I think you miss something even more obvious and more important.  There are more women in the animal rights movement for sure.

White women.

Now if women of color, who obviously lack a voice and are under more real, material as well as psychological pressures than are white women, where are they, women of color, in the animal rights movement?  

You won&#039;t find them because the line in the sand isn&#039;t gender.  It&#039;s race.  The animal rights movement is a white movement.  And its sociopathic exuberant love for animals over people of color who historically have been the underdogs in this country (and if you care to look, all around the Earth) is linked to the evidence heavy reality that white oppression has created the global underclass of Black and brown and red and yellow people.

So while I do agree with your underdog theory, it is incomplete in a fundamental way.  The displaced empathy of white people unto animals is a manifestation of the wages of whiteness, the oppressive force that has caused so much suffering around the world and that has robbed so-called white people of their humanity, of their ability to connect, to empathize and care for other humans.

Animal love is the replacement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a good point, Janice but still I think you miss something even more obvious and more important.  There are more women in the animal rights movement for sure.</p>
<p>White women.</p>
<p>Now if women of color, who obviously lack a voice and are under more real, material as well as psychological pressures than are white women, where are they, women of color, in the animal rights movement?  </p>
<p>You won&#8217;t find them because the line in the sand isn&#8217;t gender.  It&#8217;s race.  The animal rights movement is a white movement.  And its sociopathic exuberant love for animals over people of color who historically have been the underdogs in this country (and if you care to look, all around the Earth) is linked to the evidence heavy reality that white oppression has created the global underclass of Black and brown and red and yellow people.</p>
<p>So while I do agree with your underdog theory, it is incomplete in a fundamental way.  The displaced empathy of white people unto animals is a manifestation of the wages of whiteness, the oppressive force that has caused so much suffering around the world and that has robbed so-called white people of their humanity, of their ability to connect, to empathize and care for other humans.</p>
<p>Animal love is the replacement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice</title>
		<link>http://cantholdmytongue.com/2007/11/15/151/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cantholdmytongue.com/2007/11/15/151/#comment-837</guid>
		<description>Yes I&#039;m sure some people are sociopathic about various interests/causes.  However, I think a lot of animal people favor animal causes because of their inclination towards the &quot;underdog&quot;.  There are a lot more women in animal rescue than men and I think woman empathize with an animal&#039;s lack of voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I&#8217;m sure some people are sociopathic about various interests/causes.  However, I think a lot of animal people favor animal causes because of their inclination towards the &#8220;underdog&#8221;.  There are a lot more women in animal rescue than men and I think woman empathize with an animal&#8217;s lack of voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcg</title>
		<link>http://cantholdmytongue.com/2007/11/15/151/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>marcg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cantholdmytongue.com/2007/11/15/151/#comment-835</guid>
		<description>Maybe I wasn&#039;t clear. The issue is people who seem to not care about humans but exhibit deep empathy for other animals.  I see something sociopathic in that.  Do you not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I wasn&#8217;t clear. The issue is people who seem to not care about humans but exhibit deep empathy for other animals.  I see something sociopathic in that.  Do you not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice</title>
		<link>http://cantholdmytongue.com/2007/11/15/151/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cantholdmytongue.com/2007/11/15/151/#comment-833</guid>
		<description>Is there a limit to how much people can care for other beings?  Why not try and treat all beings ethically?  I think you should try reading some books/articles by the ethicist Peter Singer.  There are plenty of people helping people, why begrudge someone who wants to help an animal, especially domesticated animals who have been made slaves to humans and depend on them for their basic survival.  Dogs and cats did not ask to be born into the human world.  We, as a society have an obligation to care for them.  Most people can help themselves, and the those who truly can not deserve assistance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a limit to how much people can care for other beings?  Why not try and treat all beings ethically?  I think you should try reading some books/articles by the ethicist Peter Singer.  There are plenty of people helping people, why begrudge someone who wants to help an animal, especially domesticated animals who have been made slaves to humans and depend on them for their basic survival.  Dogs and cats did not ask to be born into the human world.  We, as a society have an obligation to care for them.  Most people can help themselves, and the those who truly can not deserve assistance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://cantholdmytongue.com/2007/11/15/151/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cantholdmytongue.com/2007/11/15/151/#comment-732</guid>
		<description>My country tis of thee....sweet land of idiocy...of thee I cringe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My country tis of thee&#8230;.sweet land of idiocy&#8230;of thee I cringe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
